Is it True?
“Dowsing doesn't work” is something you can hear quite often, if you listen to some people, usually those who consider themselves rational and scientific.
They ponder what they conceive of as evidence and make a pronouncement that dowsing doesn’t work and that all dowsers are frauds who are out to dupe the world with their wrong beliefs.
It makes me smile. It really does, because they expect me to argue back and I don’t, because they don’t want to hear the truth.
Why do critics say dowsing doesn't work?
The truth is that they base their criticism on the way they think the world works and how they think we human beings should fit into that picture.
And they’re pretty much always going to be wrong, because the picture they have of the world is so broken up, so unfinished, so full of gaps that they don’t have a picture at all. If they are lucky, they might have the beginnings of a frame with a couple dabs of color in it, but that’s about it.
I’m not just saying this to feel good. It’s the truth.
The staggering amount of ignorance bouncing around in the scientific community make your mind boggle.
For example, human prehistory? Everything we’ve got, all the bones and fragments of, maybe 5,000 individuals? It would fit into the back of a pickup truck. And that, apparently, is more than enough to make definitive statements about our ancestry.
We don’t even know what there is in the world: new species are always being discovered in unlikely places and there aren’t enough people trained to place them into the existing framework.
We don’t know why some spectacularly infectious diseases don’t spread but kill only one or two people. (In 1969, a doctor at a Yale lab contracted Lassa fever and survived, but a technician nearby, in a separate lab with no direct exposure, caught it and died.) Or why the 1918 flu epidemic was so deadly or how it came to explode into action and then killed mostly those in their 20’s and 30’s, not the very young or very old, the traditional target groups. Or why, before that, 5 million died in ten years from a sleeping sickness.
We have better maps of Mars than of our own seabeds.
Drilling deep into the crust of the earth revealed rock saturated with water – something thought not to be possible 10 kilometers down!
We don’t know how proteins do what they do in combinations. We don’t know what most of the DNA we have does. We don’t know how life actually managed to come about.
But, hey! Let’s tell all the dowsers that they are fooling people and what they do doesn’t work. That would be a bit like declaring that the takahe, a large flightless bird of New Zealand, was definitely extinct. Definitely! For over 200 years in fact.
Unfortunately, in 1995, it was rediscovered.
Taken together it means that any general condemnation by science is about as useful as saying that the takahe doesn’t exist any more. We don’t know so much about this planet and about ourselves that it seems just plain presumptuous to say what exactly humans can and can’t do.
And that’s why I don’t argue with scientists. It hurts me to see them upset. :-)
(All the examples were taken from Bill Bryson's ‘A Short History Of Nearly Everything'.)
What do you think of critics who say dowsing doesn't work? Are their arguments valid? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below